Rendered at 00:36:13 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
dieselgate 9 hours ago [-]
Textbooks, white papers and research publications if I understand what you mean by "deep technical". I like lectures and stuff too but find it difficult to refer back to later and search around.
brudgers 1 days ago [-]
[random comment on the internet]
Some content on the subject of AI is deeply technical, just as is some content on the subject of blockchain, lisp, retro-computing, etc.
But most of what is written about most things (including C, reverse engineering, systems programming, etc.) is not deeply technical.
One problem unique to AI is that “AI” doesn’t mean anything specific…I mean even your question doesn’t distinguish between articles about specific AI technologies, articles generated using LLM’s, “AI” as a marketing feature, AI as an industry, AI as an ideology etc.
iefbr14 1 days ago [-]
There is probably still a lot out there but with the current state of the ('free') search engines you won't find much. I am painfully reminded of that every time I have to look for a datasheet that is not in my own archive yet.
bohdanstefaniuk 8 hours ago [-]
In most cases documentation is enough for me when I need some help with my current day to day tasks.
If I want do dig deeper - textbooks, white papers are still a good source.
dnnddidiej 1 days ago [-]
For Go in particular: the docs. Gophercon videos.
In general good conference then Youtube. Even if old e.g. strangeloop. There is Fosdem etc.
There are a huge number of system programming books. You can also search for system programming topics on HN.
bediger4000 1 days ago [-]
At least part of the problem is that deep technical content doesn't get upvotes. The next time you see a link to such, note the vote count. It will be small. Note the vote count on some "AI" boosting link. It will be large. Is this Anthropic, Google and OpenAI bots for is it genuine interest?
tacostakohashi 11 hours ago [-]
books
1 days ago [-]
slipknotfan 1 days ago [-]
lobste.rs has some stuff
alexjplant 24 hours ago [-]
I'd love an invite if you have one to spare (no expectation either way). Email is in my profile if you feel so inclined.
unmole 23 hours ago [-]
Invite sent.
kovoor 18 hours ago [-]
Do you happen to have any more? Would really appreciate to have an invite as well, thanks again (email is in bio)
shavi71 15 hours ago [-]
I would appreciate an invite too (email in my about column)
Charon77 19 hours ago [-]
Would appreciate invite too (email in my about column)
unmole 18 hours ago [-]
Done.
Charon77 18 hours ago [-]
Much obliged!
spidersouris 12 hours ago [-]
Would also be interested in an invite, if anyone has any. Email on my user page.
pseudo-usama 1 days ago [-]
lobsters genuinely seems more technical and less hype driven than HN these days
ken-jo 19 hours ago [-]
Thank you for share it.
user68858788 1 days ago [-]
That's a neat site but I'm stuck looking in from the outside. Can someone spare me an invite please? My email is in my about.
yash1th 21 hours ago [-]
sorry for piling on but I'd love an invite as well if you can spare :)
email is in my profile.
Some content on the subject of AI is deeply technical, just as is some content on the subject of blockchain, lisp, retro-computing, etc.
But most of what is written about most things (including C, reverse engineering, systems programming, etc.) is not deeply technical.
One problem unique to AI is that “AI” doesn’t mean anything specific…I mean even your question doesn’t distinguish between articles about specific AI technologies, articles generated using LLM’s, “AI” as a marketing feature, AI as an industry, AI as an ideology etc.
If I want do dig deeper - textbooks, white papers are still a good source.
In general good conference then Youtube. Even if old e.g. strangeloop. There is Fosdem etc.